altenar2.gif
altenar2.gif
altenar2.gif
CLOSE
× Gambling News In-Depth iGaming Calendar Connections GI Friday Trafficology GI Magazine
GGA 2019 AffiliateCon
Edward Obeng

Edward Obeng

Having graduated with a Broadcast Journalism degree, Edward has produced work with a number of local newspapers before joining Gambling Insider.
News | Press Releases
17th March
Presidential hopeful vows to cover Filipino casinos by AMLA
16th March
New Jersey citizens to vote on casino expansion
16th March
Bermuda launches Designated Sites application process
16th March
Cyprus reveals casino resort shortlist
15th March
Paddy Power Betfair partners with Worldpay
15th March
Tribal casino fast-tracked to August 2017
14th March
All change at Ladbrokes Australia: Jarvis in for Burnett at CMO
14th March
Sportsbet calls for an end to betting ad blitz
9th March
TonyBet first operator to be granted Lithuanian gaming licence
9th March
More unrest in Japanese sport as new betting scandal comes to light
8th March
Florida legislature rejects $3m tribal deal
8th March
Simon Trim appointed CEO of Sporting Index
8th March
Alibaba looking to exploit loopholes, introducing poker to China
7th March
888 changing rewards programme, ditching rakeback
7th March
ICC claims anti-corruption force is thwarting match-fixing plan
2nd March
No money for Taj Mahal if New Jersey casinos are approved
2nd March
IH to build $10bn casino on Rota
2nd March
888 appoints Frieberger as new CEO
1st March
Rank appoints Steven Esom as non-executive director
1st March
Hong Kong Jockey Club refuses to take bets on Chinese Super League
29th February
Paddy Power shares anti-money laundering failures
24th February
Groups oppose NFL’s cash prize DFS programme for kids
24th February
Atlantic City mayor labels state takeover plan a “fascist dictatorship”
24th February
Tennis leaders summoned before UK Parliament committee over match-fixing
23rd February
Bettson AB appoints Ulrik Bengtsson as CEO and president
23rd February
Intertain chief executive confirms he is set to stand down
23rd February
ICE attendance grows for another year, exceeding 28,000
22nd February
Ladbrokes' sponsorship of Cheltenham's World Hurdle ends
22nd February
R.Franco acquires Mediatech Solutions stake
17th February
Israel to discuss casinos
17th February
AFL introduces media betting rule
16th February
Dutch FA alleges match fixing
11th February
ESSA to tackle crime in sport
10th February
PokerStars removes heads-up cash games
9th February
Pennsylvania Committee supports removal of sports-betting ban
9th February
Keith Bristow to lead new anti-money laundering group
8th February
NeoGames strikes deal with Czech’s Sazka
8th February
Sportsbet fights for online in-play betting
3rd February
Racing Australia CEO wants in-play loophole changed
3rd February
GVC appoints new directors
3rd February
Paddy Power Betfair is out of the blocks
1st February
150 arrested in two Thai gambling den raids
1st February
Macau gambling revenue drops again
27th January
More big brands added to Lithuania’s gambling blacklist
27th January
Jowell acknowledges ineffectiveness in tackling FOBT dangers
27th January
Contractors may be on the hook for $200m if Wynn casino delays continue
26th January
US casino market to hit $93bn by 2020
26th January
Microgaming to launch new duel-release games in February
25th January
Kambi deal with LeoVegas to provide sports betting technology
25th January
Phil Ivey to launch white-label DFS site on iTEAM network



n2live.jpg
GI FRIDAY: WEEKLY NEWSLETTER
THE GI HUDDLE PODCAST
NEW! #006 - LISTEN NOW
Gaming Industry Conferences (22:37)
#005 - LISTEN NOW
The role of gambling media (27:11)
#004 - LISTEN NOW
What is the role of a Gambling regulator? (29:09)
#003
The Future of Gambling Sponsorship in Sport (30:50)
ANALYSIS
MUST READ
IN-DEPTH 11 October 2019
Landing on a monopoly

Matthew Enderby asks who benefits from a monopoly-driven gambling market and if there is any point in maintaining one.

It can appear anti-capitalist, like the government wants total control. Players are ushered to a single, often state-run operator, and only one supplier is contracted to provide the platform, making the gambling market seemingly easier to manage. But does that hold true? When monopolistic gambling markets are enforced, who is the winner? Do the players benefit from what is meant to be a safer environment? Will the public perception of gambling be more positive than in an open market?

To answer these results-based questions, the motivations behind a monopoly-driven market need to be looked at first. The initial question is always: Why? A few quick answers spring to mind. It might be testing out gambling and observing how its country responds once the option to have a bet is made legal and available. With only one operator in place, player protection seems like a reasonable motivator.

It would be easier to keep track of addiction and factors leading to problem gambling as all the data, theoretically, could be accessed in one location. The main motivator however, is revenue. With the market dominated by a single legal operator, all of the country’s gambling revenue will flow through it and to the government. But for this to be effective, there cannot be any offshore operators present.

The Swedish gambling market was opened up at the start of the year, and private companies were free to apply for a license. The reasoning for this, according to state-run operator Svenska Spel, was to achieve fair market conditions and bring order. Life before the update in legislation was not entirely different to what it is today. Despite being closed to private companies, Patrik Hofbauer, CEO of Svenksa Spel, says the previous market was only a monopoly on paper.

He tells Gambling Insider: “Around 90% to 95% of the companies now operating with licenses in the Swedish market have been here for more than 10 years, so we are already used to competition.”

Offshore operators were present in Sweden for more than 10 years. They did not pay tax and found ways to navigate around the law. Up until the start of the year, there were three legal operators. Svenksa Spel handled betting, ATG specified in horseracing, and Postkodlotteriet managed the lotteries.

A MediaVision study from October showed 60% of Swedes aged between 18 and 74 had a registered account at the end of June 2018; a 12% rise year-on-year. Roughly 58% of these accounts were with one of the three state-run operators.

On the surface, this seems like a success story for the monopolistic market, but where are the rest of them registered? Nearly half of Sweden’s gamblers, 42%, were registered with international operators. These companies held no Swedish license or authority to offer a service in the country.

What’s worse, where the monopoly is concerned, is 60% of all new accounts registered within the 12 months leading up to 30 June were with these businesses. With so many players setting up with unregistered companies, the idea of a monopoly making gambling safer, with upheld regulation, is incorrect.

Now the market has gone through its changes and levelled out, Hofbauer finds order is in place and player protection has improved. He says: “We now have a level playing field for gambling operators, increased revenues for the state, and clear rules to protect customers against excessive gambling thanks to stronger and better consumer protection. It has ultimately benefitted the Swedish customers, which is the biggest win.”

The move away from a monopolistic approach has not exactly produced a goldmine for other operators, and certainly not for Svenksa Spel. A look at its first quarter results shows a 6% year-on-year decline in revenue to SEK 2.05bn ($197.4m). Its land-based operations, Casino Cosmopol & Vegas, fell 17% to SEK416m, while lottery dropped 6% to SEK 1.1bn. It reported SEK 544m in revenue from sport and casino, a 4% increase. Operating profit for the quarter decreased 55% to SEK 519m. Svenska Spel paid SEK 401m in gaming taxes for the quarter.

While it won’t be impressed with revenue for Q1, the operator stressed one of the biggest challenges in the transition was launching three new products. Hofbauer says: “Business wise, it is positive that we now can offer our customers products like online casino and horseracing, and also offer more competitive pricing."

Improved pricing is another reason Swedish customers will be happy with the change in legislation. So who exactly has been benefitting in the monopolistic structure besides state operators making easy tax revenue? Suppliers might have the most to gain from a monopolistic market. Being selected by the government to provide technology solutions for its online or land-based operations signifies trust. Suppliers will have to earn that trust by proving their platforms can generate the most revenue for the government’s operator.

The appeal behind branding in this case is also undeniable and the opportunity for a supplier to be the leading face is not one to be missed. Building brand recognition in a country where you are the only brand is obviously much easier. The competition exists, but only through unlicensed companies that will not want to attract further attention to their operations in that specific location.

In April, Kambi extended its contract with Bulgaria’s National Lottery JSC, parent company of the Moldovan National Lottery, to supply online and retail sportsbook. The operator is expected to enter Moldova in the summer, where a monopoly is in place.

Kambi CCO Max Meltzer spoke exclusively to Gambling Insider after the deal and said: “From a technological standpoint and user experience, it will be like going into an ATG shop in Sweden right now. We are really excited to say this is not a monopolistic situation where players will get a bad experience from a bad solution."

The sports betting supplier was keen to emphasise that players in this monopoly would not be neglected as a result of the structure set out by the government and it would supply the same level of technology as it would to any market across the world. Only time will tell if Moldova’s bettors do receive this standard of solutions. But what we do know is, with a lack of legal competition for market share, the Moldovan National Lottery will not be pushing its supplier as much as it would have in an open market, to develop niche solutions.

The evidence is stacked against monopolies and it is clear governments still using them are doing so in a misguided attempt to stay in total control and generate state revenue. The irony is the complete opposite is true. More state tax is made in the open market and players are being protected better when operators are acting under approved licenses. Drop the monopoly, it’s good for nobody.

READ MORE
PREMIUM CONNECTIONS