Published
OnlineLegal & RegulatoryIndustry

Gambling Commission CEO on Football Index: “I am genuinely upset for those people who bet life savings and money”

Football Index’s (FI) collapse caused chaos for the Gambling Commission, whose competence was called into question following a report on the incident from the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS).

AndrewRhodesBlog

Commission CEO Andrew Rhodes has since taken to the watchdog’s blog to answer the public’s questions regarding the whole affair.

In a series of lengthy responses, Rhodes discusses several subjects, from the regulator’s technological literacy to its integrity.

First off, the executive fields a question about whether or not Football Index operated as a ‘Ponzi Scheme’, with a detailed answer breaking down what constitutes such a scheme, as well as clearly outlining why Football Index wasn’t one.

In his response Rhodes categorically denies such a claim, saying: “The Commission did not license a Ponzi scheme, and the independent report’s findings concluded that Football Index was not operating as a Ponzi scheme.”

He then goes onto to answer a question about remedial compensation, and explains why the Gambling Commission cannot offer redress, which, according to the CEO, primarily owes to its lack of statutory powers.

“Some sectors have statutory compensation schemes and others have voluntary ones. Many sectors do not have this, however, and as such in the Commission’s case, there is no fund from which any redress could be provided in the event of a gambling operator collapsing,” he said.

Then, perhaps most importantly, Rhodes discusses the accusation that the Commission simply did not understand Football Index’s product.

In his answer, he contends that gambling regulations do not encompass the entirety of the service that FI was offering, and remarked: “The ability to sell bets/shares between users was something the company put in place immediately, but it did so without any permission. This is a feature that sits outside gambling regulation and is something that the Commission would be likely to refuse and had done so before.”

This is an issue that has now come up again regarding the regulator’s statement on, and subsequent investigation into, NFT fantasy football site Sorare.com, which utilises blockchain technology for its digital trading card game.

However, Rhodes refuted the notion that the Commission did not understand Football Index, stating: “The independent report didn’t conclude that the Commission did not understand the product it had licensed, but did conclude that what BetIndex operated was only partly what had been licensed by the Commission.”

In his final summary, Rhodes, despite not being Chief Executive at the time, accepted full responsibility for the actions of the Gambling Commission, and reiterated the regulator’s commitment to its role as the UK’s top gambling watchdog.

Premium+ Connections
 
Premium
 
Premium
 
Premium
 
Premium
 
Premium
 
Premium
 
Premium
 
Premium
 
Premium
 
Premium
 
Premium Connections
Consultancy
Executive Profiles
Soft2Bet
Scientific Games
Digitain Malta
Follow Us

Facing Facts: Q3 2024 analysis

Gambling Insider takes a look at the Q3 results of operators...

Taking stock: The final count of 2024

Gambling Insider tracks operator and supplier prices of some...

CEO Special: Flutter CEO Peter Jackson – Playing to win

As the biggest publicly traded operator in gambling meets th...

CEO Special: Holland Casino CEO Petra de Ruiter – High flier

Petra de Ruiter, Holland Casino CEO, speaks to Gambling Insi...

A welcome from your host

A message from the Founder of the Global Gaming Awards and G...

From the event manager

A message from the Event Manager of the Global Gaming Awards...

From the Awards adjudicator

KPMG in the Crown Dependencies is the official voting adjudi...

The process

The Global Gaming Awards have deservingly earned the reputat...