CFTC Builds Innovation Framework as Political Pressure Mounts Over Prediction Markets
New Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Chairman Michael Selig has begun reshaping the agency's approach to prediction markets. Since assuming the position on December 22, he has already appointed a new chief of staff, launched an Innovation Advisory Committee (IAC), and chosen the CFTC to maintain a no-action stance on event-based prediction markets that are rapidly expanding nationwide.
On January 12, he announced the launch of the IAC, previously known as the Technology Advisory Committee. Its goal is to provide recommendations on financial markets innovation by gathering insights from experts.
The committee will draw viewpoints from a wide range of sources, including regulators, academia, and the financial industry. It is designed to advise the agency on emerging technologies. This includes artificial intelligence, blockchain, and novel financial products, such as event-based derivatives.
Announcing the IAC, Selig said the committee will play a vital role in advising the CFTC on the implications of emerging products and business models, such as AI and blockchain, ahead of what he called the “Golden Age of American Financial Markets.”
The launch signals a forward-looking regulatory posture even as political and industry scrutiny of prediction markets intensifies.
Making a Statement With No-Action Stance
Prediction market platforms are one of the biggest disruptors to both the gambling and financial sectors in recent years. So far, Selig has avoided taking a definitive position.
During his November confirmation hearing, Senator Tina Smith asked him if the CFTC would shut down prediction markets that she implied breached existing state gaming laws. He responded by saying that this is a complex situation. He added that he will “look to the courts” to dictate what approach he takes.
Then on January 8, the CFTC took a no-action position in a case involving the Bitnomial Exchange. This platform offers event-based contracts on non-sporting events, including macroeconomic, financial, or cryptocurrency-related events. The relief applies to Bitnomial Exchange and its affiliated clearinghouse, covering specific swap data reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
The no-action approach means the CFTC will not pursue enforcement for failure to follow swap data reporting and recordkeeping rules, provided the conditions are met. The CFTC is allowing the exchange to operate through non-objection rather than formal approval. That effectively gives federally regulated event-based contracts a path to operate without the agency ruling on their legality under gambling law.
That means the CFTC has chosen to allow prediction markets to operate under derivatives supervision rather than gambling law. This places the agency in a position of regulatory restraint rather than outright endorsement.
Continuing Industry and Political Protests
For now, the CFTC is exercising regulatory restraint on prediction markets. It isn’t endorsing these platforms, but it’s also not trying to shut them down. This stance persists despite objections from the industry. Those objections are now escalating into coordinated lobbying and congressional pressure.
Most recently, the American Gaming Association (AGA) and Indian Gaming Association (IGA) sent a joint letter to Congress. They called for Congress to apply the crypto market structure law to ban any form of gambling through CFTC-licensed platforms. The groups argue that sports event contracts offered through prediction markets amount to illegal sports betting conducted outside of state and tribal regulatory frameworks.
A dozen senators then sent their own letter to Selig following the recent insider trading controversy. An alleged insider used prior knowledge of Venezuela’s leader, Nicolas Maduro’s capture, to win $409,882 on Polymarket.
The lawmakers requested that the regulator investigate the risks of insider trading associated with prediction markets. The senators also questioned whether the CFTC is effectively allowing nationwide gambling through derivatives markets.
These letters echo earlier warnings from lawmakers that the CFTC risks undermining state gaming law by declining to block sports-based event contracts. That fight has already been playing out in courts.
Against that backdrop, prediction market operators are moving aggressively to influence the political landscape. The Coalition for Prediction Markets recently appointed former Congressman Sean Patrick Maloney as CEO and former House Financial Services Chair Patrick McHenry as a senior adviser. The move underscores the industry’s intention to engage in these battles in Washington.
Selig’s early actions suggest that his version of the CFTC is letting the courts or Congress write the next chapter for prediction markets— even as lawsuits and enforcement threats continue to accelerate around the sector.
Gambling Insider delivers the latest industry news, in-depth features, and operator reviews that you can trust. Our team combines rigorous editorial standards with decades of specialized expertise to ensure accuracy and fairness. We are committed to delivering clear, impartial, and dependable coverage across the global gambling sector.
