Summary: Federal Court refers Tipico case in Germany to the ECJ

Dr Joerg Hofmann, Partner at Melchers Law, provides a summary of a key decision issued by the German Federal Court of Justice today.

hofmann
Listen To Article

The German Federal Court of Justice (‘Bundesgerichtshof” – BGH) will call the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in regard to the question of whether the freedom to provide services of a sports betting operator precludes the reimbursement of losses suffered by players in the context of unauthorised online sports betting.

The court published a corresponding press release on 25 July 2024, regarding a high-profile case in Germany involving operator Tipico.

This question had been lingering beneath the surface for almost a decade and has certainly culminated in the so-called player claims that have been hitting the gambling industry in Germany for about three years now.

In the specific case, the plaintiff participated in online sports betting offered by an operator based in Malta from 2013 to 9 October 2020. This brand operated a German-language website but did not have the required licence to offer sports betting in Germany as per the 2012 State Treaty on Gambling.

It will be interesting to see how the ECJ will evaluate the shortcomings of German gambling regulation, which have long been criticised by the gambling industry, in this context

The operator only received the necessary licence on 9 October 2020, under a new licensing procedure. The plaintiff is demanding the reimbursement of lost bets amounting to €3,719.26 ($4,000), arguing that the betting contracts are void due to the violation of the State Treaty on Gambling.

The BGH raises the question of whether EU law requires a special assessment, especially since a former licensing procedure in 2012 was conducted unlawfully under EU law. The ECJ had previously ruled that a member state cannot impose criminal sanctions for behavior if it has itself violated EU law. Therefore, it must be clarified whether these principles also apply to civil claims.

The ECJ's decision is highly anticipated, as it could have far-reaching implications for the legal treatment of online gambling offers and the enforcement of consumer rights in the EU.

It is now to be expected that numerous proceedings pending before the civil courts will be suspended in anticipation of the forthcoming decision of the ECJ. It will be interesting to see how the ECJ will evaluate the shortcomings of German gambling regulation, which have long been criticised by the gambling industry, in this context.

Premium+ Connections
Premium
 
Premium
 
 
Premium
 
 
Premium
 
Premium
 
Premium
 
Premium
 
Premium
 
Premium
 
Premium Connections
Consultancy
Executive Profiles
Crown Melbourne
Resorts World Las Vegas
Crown Melbourne
Global Gaming Women
Svenska Spel
Follow Us

Facing facts: FY revenue figures reflect a turbulent '24

Who soared high and who fell behind in 2024? Gambling Inside...

Taking stock: Moving through to Q2

Gambling Insider tracks online casino operator and supplier...

Preview: This year's Global Gaming Awards Asia-Pacific and Americas

It’s that time of year once again, as the Global Gaming Aw...

Costa Rica: Effective regulation is the industry's path forward

Gambling Insider Senior Staff Writer Beth Turner spoke with...

Preview: Global Gaming Awards Asia-Pacific 2025

The Global Gaming Awards Asia-Pacific’s highly anticipated...

Preview: SiGMA Manila 2025

The return of the Philippines’ annual summer gaming summit...

Company profile: Gameplay Interactive

A multi-currency & multilingual white-label and turnkey solu...

Company profile: Lynon

Expertise & commercial flexibilities: In the ever-changing l...