2020_11_betinvest.gif
2020_11_betinvest.gif
2020_11_betinvest.gif
CLOSE
× Gambling News In-Depth iGaming Calendar Connections GI Friday Trafficology GI Magazine GGA 2020 AffiliateCon
NEWS 23 June 2017

CJEU rules Hungarian licensing regime incompatible with EU law

By Tom Lewis
The Court of Justice for the European Union (CJEU) has ruled that Hungary’s licensing framework for online gambling places overly restrictive and unfair conditions on European operators looking to enter the market.

In a case brought to court by Kindred Group through its Unibet brand, the CJEU found the Hungarian licensing regime to be in contravention of Article 56 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, which prevents member states from disrupting cross-border trade and services.

Having updated its licensing framework in 2014, Hungary proposed allowing the country’s brick-and-mortar establishments to apply for online licenses, while online sports betting was to be restricted to the state run monopoly, Szerencsejáték Zrt.

It also required that outside licensees be classified as “trustworthy”, which has been interpreted by Hungarian legislators to mean that they had operated games of chance in Hungary for no less than 10 years.

International operators complained that these measures were biased towards domestic operators, and levelled that the provisions were not written in a clear enough manner.

Commenting on the court’s decision, Maarten Haijer, Secretary General of the European Betting and Gaming Association, said: “The Court reiterated that member states must guarantee that national regulation on online gambling services meets objective, transparent, non-discriminatory and proportionate criteria.

“Only a properly regulated and transparent online gambling market can ensure that the consumer is channelled to the regulated offer.

“The Court’s ruling is a clear message to other gaming authorities, including the Dutch Gaming Authority, that they must not enforce regulation that does not comply with basic EU law.

“We expect these member states to reconsider and lift these enforcement measures as they are acting in violation of EU law. Their actions do not serve the interest of consumers, they fail to channel the consumers to reliable providers, instead they merely prop up failed regulation.“

RELATED TAGS: Legal & Regulatory
2020_9_relax.gif
GI FRIDAY: WEEKLY NEWSLETTER
THE GI HUDDLE PODCAST
NEW! #006 - LISTEN NOW
Gaming Industry Conferences (22:37)
#005 - LISTEN NOW
The role of gambling media (27:11)
#004 - LISTEN NOW
What is the role of a Gambling regulator? (29:09)
#003
The Future of Gambling Sponsorship in Sport (30:50)
MUST READ
IN-DEPTH 16 March 2020
Is there an ideal RTP rate?
READ MORE
PREMIUM CONNECTIONS
Payments
Zimpler
VIEW PROFILE
Systems and Software
Newgioco Group
VIEW PROFILE
Systems and Software
Efbet
VIEW PROFILE
Systems and Software
NSoft
VIEW PROFILE
Systems and Software
BBIN
VIEW PROFILE
Legal and Jurisdictions
Digital Isle of Man
VIEW PROFILE
Affiliate
1xPartners
VIEW PROFILE
PR and Marketing
ActiveWins
VIEW PROFILE
Industry Awards
Global Gaming Awards
VIEW PROFILE
Systems and Software
BetConstruct
VIEW PROFILE