BGC raises concerns over GSGB survey methodology

The BGC has argued that the GSGB findings might be unreliable due to the potential overstatement of gambling participation and related harms.

survey
Listen To Article

It's been a big day for betting news, especially so in the UK market. Today, the Gambling Commission finally released its new survey on problem gambling, which was always going to attract a variety responses.

And, indeed, the Betting and Gaming Council (BGC) has expressed concerns regarding the methodology used in the recent Gambling Survey for Great Britain (GSGB).

According to a BGC spokesperson, the survey's approach differs significantly from previous studies on betting and gaming, prompting the Gambling Commission to caution against using GSGB results to compare with past surveys, measure addiction or extrapolate problem gambling prevalence across the entire population.

The BGC argues that the GSGB findings might be unreliable due to the potential overstatement of gambling participation and related harms, pointing out that surveys relying mainly on online self-completion tend to produce higher estimates of gambling participation and associated harms compared to traditional survey methods.

An independent review of the GSGB by Professor Patrick Sturgis from the London School of Economics supports the BGC's concerns, advising policymakers to treat the survey figures with caution due to the "non-negligible risk" of overstating the true levels of gambling and gambling harm in the population.

It must be stated overall, though, that the Commission has been very clear about the change in its methodology and that it has not hidden Sturgis' independent review

The BGC’s spokesperson stated: “The methodology used in this survey is different to those previously conducted into betting and gaming. As a result, the Gambling Commission has been clear, GSGB should not be used to make direct comparisons with results from prior surveys, as a measure of addiction or to gross up problem gambling prevalence to the whole population.

“Our members are concerned these findings may be unreliable because there is a significant risk GSGB overstates gambling participation and gambling-related harm.

“The BGC and our members are committed to raising standards and we welcome any robust study that accurately gauges betting and gaming participation and problem gambling prevalence.”

Earlier this week, the BGC announced that its members have donated £172.5m ($222.73m) to address problem gambling over the last four years, with the funding largely being used to support Research, Prevention and Treatment (RPT) initiatives.

It must be stated overall, though, that the Commission has been very clear about the change in its methodology and that it has not hidden Sturgis' independent review.

Premium+ Connections
Premium
 
Premium
 
Premium
 
 
 
Premium
 
Premium
 
Premium
 
Premium
 
Premium
 
Premium
 
Premium Connections
Consultancy
Executive Profiles
Light & Wonder
Westgate Resorts
Imagine Live
Live! Casino & Hotel Louisiana
GGA: EMEA 2025 Shortlist
Follow Us

Facing Facts: Q3 2024 analysis

Gambling Insider takes a look at the Q3 results of operators...

Taking stock: The final count of 2024

Gambling Insider tracks operator and supplier prices of some...

CEO Special: Flutter CEO Peter Jackson – Playing to win

As the biggest publicly traded operator in gambling meets th...

CEO Special: Holland Casino CEO Petra de Ruiter – High flier

Petra de Ruiter, Holland Casino CEO, speaks to Gambling Insi...

A welcome from your host

A message from the Founder of the Global Gaming Awards and G...

From the event manager

A message from the Event Manager of the Global Gaming Awards...

From the Awards adjudicator

KPMG in the Crown Dependencies is the official voting adjudi...

The process

The Global Gaming Awards have deservingly earned the reputat...