Kalshi Agrees to Use Third-Party Vendor to Keep Sports Markets Out of Nevada
Nevada Gaming Control Board gives Kalshi until Aug. 12 to implement GeoComply solution
Prediction market operator Kalshi has reached a deal with Nevada, agreeing to use a third-party geofencing provider to keep people in the Silver State from trading contracts on elections, entertainment, or sporting events.
Under the terms the Nevada Gaming Control Board made public late Friday, Kalshi has until Aug. 12 to have the location-restricting software up and running. Failure to meet that deadline would result in a $120,000 per-day fine.
According to a joint stipulation order the parties submitted in a Carson City court, Kalshi contracted with GeoComply to develop that solution. Kalshi also agreed to update the state regulator on the project’s status.
“This agreement will ensure that Kalshi fully complies with Nevada law moving forward, or it will face stiff penalties,” NGCB Chair Mike Dreitzer said in a statement. “We will continue to vigorously enforce Nevada law to safeguard gaming in our state.”
The arrangement comes more than two months after a state judge issued a preliminary injunction against Kalshi. The NGCB sued, arguing Kalshi’s contracts were the same as gambling and Kalshi, a federally regulated operator, did not have a state license.
Initially, Kalshi tried to use an in-house solution to restrict access. However, some Nevada residents reported they could still get through to those markets. The NGCB said in its statement that investigators “repeatedly” made trades for contracts that were supposed to be off limits.
As a result, the board sought to find Kalshi in contempt of the injunction, with a hearing set to take place this Wednesday. In the filing submitted to the court on Thursday, Kalshi and the NGCB asked for a cancellation of that hearing.
Acknowledge, But Not Concede
According to the parties’ court filing, the geofencing solution would stay in place for the duration of the injunction.
Kalshi’s in-house solution to block traders in Nevada relied solely on a user’s internet protocol (IP) address. According to court documents, Kalshi spent less than $200,000 in creating it and used family and friends to test the solution.
“Kalshi acknowledges that, notwithstanding Kalshi’s implementation of IP-based and residency-based trading blocks, the state’s investigators have successfully placed trades in sports-, election-, and entertainment-related event contracts during the pendency of the court’s amended PI order,” the joint stipulation stated. “For avoidance of doubt, Kalshi does not concede that any such trades amount to cause for an order of contempt, and Kalshi reserves all rights and defenses in this aspect.”
A Kalshi spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment sent late Friday.
‘An Extraordinary Situation’
Nevada is not the only state that has won an injunction against Kalshi to block it from offering contracts it deemed illegal. Late last month, a Michigan judge handed down a temporary restraining order against the operator from offering sports contracts in the Great Lakes State. Ingham Circuit Court Judge Rosemarie E. Aquilina also stipulated that Kalshi needed to employ a third-party solution to prevent anyone in Michigan from trading those contracts.
The joint stipulation in Nevada shows Kalshi is also working with GeoComply in Michigan.
Earlier this month, Aquilina extended the order, giving Kalshi until Aug. 12. Failure to meet that deadline would lead to a daily fine of $500,000. However, U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission Chairman Michael Selig issued an order calling on the operator to disregard the state court ruling.
That subject came up during a House Agriculture Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digital Assets, and Rural Development hearing in Washington Tuesday. U.S. Rep. Kristen McDonald Rivet (D-Mich.) asked panelists their thoughts on Selig’s actions, which she said puts Kalshi in an unenviable position of facing civil penalties regardless of its actions.
The consensus was it shows a need for state and federal regulators to work better with one another.
“I think we’d all like to see better cooperation,” said Robert Schwartz, a partner in the derivatives practice at Morgan, Lewis & Bockius and a former CFTC general counsel. “The explosion of litigation is not something that we have seen before, just as the order that came out from the commission. It had been 46 years since the commission had issued any order under its emergency authority. So we are in an extraordinary situation.”
Gambling Insider delivers the latest industry news, in-depth features, and operator reviews that you can trust. Our team combines rigorous editorial standards with decades of specialized expertise to ensure accuracy and fairness. We are committed to delivering clear, impartial, and dependable coverage across the global gambling sector.
