iovation2019.png
iovation2019.png
iovation2019.png
CLOSE
× Gambling News In-Depth iGaming Calendar Connections GI Friday Trafficology GI Magazine GGA 2019 AffiliateCon
NEWS 21 February 2019

Scientific Games revenue grows in 2018 but net loss up 45%

By Tim Poole

Scientific Games has reported a 9% increase in full-year revenue, to $3.36bn, during 2018.

However, the supplier’s net loss grew 45% during the period, to $352.4m. This is explained by costs including that of restructuring and the $151.5m settlement it agreed in December, over a legal dispute with Shuffle Tech.

Subsidiary SG Digital more than trebled its adjusted EBITDA from $16m in 2017 to $54.1m in 2018, with revenue increasing almost four-fold, from $65.8m to $269.6m.

Revenue wise, although Scientific Games' total for the financial year is significantly larger, its rate of growth is on par with fellow suppliers NetEnt (9%, to $192m) and Konami’s Gaming & Systems division (8%, to $1.77bn).

Playtech, which also announced its results on Thursday, reported a 54% growth to $1.4bn – although this was heavily influenced by its purchase of Snaitech.

Scientific Games’ consolidated adjusted EBITDA rose 9% to $1.32bn in 2018, while net cash provided by operating activities fell from $507.1m to $346.1m, primarily reflective of the Shuffle Tech settlement.

In Q4, revenue grew 8% year-on-year to $885.7m, while net income was $206.8m, compared to a net loss of $43.1m in Q4 2017.

Consolidated adjusted EBITDA increased 6% to $343.5m; net cash provided by operating activities, though, fell from $118.1m to -$9.8m, another measure heavily impacted by the Shuffle Tech settlement.

Barry Cottle, Scientific Games CEO and President, said: "This is a very exciting time. We are building momentum and continuing to grow our business while at the same time operating more efficiently."

RELATED TAGS: Online | Sports Betting | Financial | Lottery | Casino
DISCUSS THIS ARTICLE
IN-DEPTH 18 March 2019
No need for sports lotteries

Charles Gillespie, CEO of Gambling.com Group, argues that US states would be better off privatising sports betting markets

READ MORE
PREMIUM CONNECTIONS
VNE