Published
OnlineCasinoLegal & Regulatory

High Court rules in favour of Paddy Power customer over £1m jackpot dispute 

The ruling addresses the reliability of online gambling platforms and the expectation that displayed results reflect actual winnings.  

win case
Listen To Article

Key points: 

- The High Court ruled that Paddy Power must pay a £1m jackpot to a customer after initially awarding £20,000 due to a display error

- The judge emphasised that players expect on-screen results in online gambling to be accurate and binding

- Paddy Power argued the jackpot was incorrectly displayed due to a game malfunction  

The High Court has ruled that Paddy Power must award a £1m ($1.2m) jackpot to a player who was initially informed she had won the sum but later told it was an error.  

Corrine Durber, from Gloucestershire, played one of the operator’s online games in October 2020 and received an on-screen message confirming she had won the “Monster Jackpot” worth £1,097,132.71. 

However, she was later informed that she had actually won the smaller “Daily Jackpot” of £20,265.14 due to what Paddy Power described as a game display malfunction.  

PPB Entertainment Limited, which operates Paddy Power and Betfair, argued that the game’s random number generator had determined the smaller jackpot was the correct outcome, but a display error resulted in the larger prize being shown. 

Durber sued the company for breach of contract, maintaining that she was entitled to the full amount.  

Mr Justice Ritchie ruled in her favour, granting summary judgment without the need for a full trial. He stated that the principle of “what you see is what you get” applies to online gambling and that customers expect game results displayed on screen to be accurate. 

He compared this expectation to a physical casino, where players would anticipate being paid if a roulette ball landed on their chosen number.  

Following the ruling, Durber criticised the operator’s handling of the dispute, stating that the legal process had been stressful and that the company should have honoured the payout immediately.  

Good to know: A spokesperson for Flutter UKI, Paddy Power’s parent company, acknowledged the ruling and stated that the company is reviewing the judgment 

Flutter also highlighted its history of awarding large winnings, including a £5.7m jackpot payout last year.  

The case echoes a similar legal dispute in 2021 when a player sued Betfred after being denied a £1.7m jackpot due to a software malfunction. The High Court ruled in favour of the player, ordering the bookmaker to pay the full amount plus interest.

This case also follows other recent developments involving Paddy Power, including its Bigger 180 campaign, which has raised over £1m for Prostate Cancer UK. The campaign donates funds for every 180 scored in the World Darts Championship and is part of the company’s wider responsible gambling initiatives.

Premium+ Connections
Premium

Galaxsys

 
 
Premium

Digitain

 
Premium

1xBet Partners

 
Premium

Imagine Live

 
Premium

Sport Generate

 
 
Premium

Lynon

 
Premium

RISK

 
Premium Connections
Consultancy

SCCG Management

Executive Profiles
Scientific Games

Keshav Pitani

Esportes Gaming Brasil

Ana Carolina Luna Maçães

LeoVegas

Mattias Wedar

Kalshi

Sara Slane

Follow Us

Taking stock: Counting on crypto

Gambling Insider tracks the value of the biggest cryptocurre...

In focus: MiFinity

A trusted payments partner for the iGaming industry....

Panel: LatAm and crypto lead the way

During the SBC Summit Americas in Florida, executives from N...

In focus: Spayz.io

Payments that actually work for iGaming operators…...

A welcome from your host

A message from the Founder of the Global Gaming Awards and G...

From the Lead Partner

A message from BetConstruct - Lead Partner of the Global Gam...

The year in review

The Event Manager of the Global Gaming Awards reviews the mo...

Casino Operator of the Year 2025

We present to you the 2025 Shortlist for the Casino Operator...