Published
Land-BasedCasinoLegal & RegulatoryIndustry

Victorian regulator targets Crown Melbourne over chips for cheques practice

Crown Resorts is once more facing disciplinary action in Victoria almost one year after the company was deemed “unsuitable” to operate its Melbourne casino.

vgccc crown melbourne gambling insider web image

Victoria’s Gambling and Casino Control Commission (VGCCC) has commenced disciplinary proceedings against Crown Melbourne over its “bank and blank cheques practices.”

Based on the findings of last year’s Royal Commission, the regulator said Crown breached section 68 of the Casino Control Act, which prohibits licensed entities from extending credit to patrons in connection with gambling.

More specifically, customers were allowed to exchange a blank cheque – made payable to Crown – for chips used to gamble at the Melbourne casino.

“The Casino Control Act establishes restrictions on Crown’s financial interactions with its patrons,” said Fran Thorn, VGCCC Chair.

“These restrictions are vital because they protect patrons from gambling beyond their means and guard the Melbourne casino against criminal influence and exploitation.”

This comes after a Royal Commission in 2021 found Crown Melbourne “unsuitable” to hold a licence, and appointed a so-called “Special Manager” to supervise its operations for two years.

Once this period ends, the VGCCC will determine whether Crown is suitable to “regain the privilege of holding the Melbourne casino licence unsupervised.”

Thorn continued: “The Royal Commission found that Crown adopted practices involving the use of blank cheques and bank cheques that breached these important restrictions.”

As a result, Crown has been issued a notice and must now provide information relevant to the VGCCC’s “consideration of any disciplinary action.”

Possible actions include a fine of up to AU$100m (US$68m), “varying the casino licence” or issuing a letter of censure to Crown and ordering it to undertake certain steps.

This is the third disciplinary process brought against Crown Melbourne based on the Royal Commission’s findings.

Premium+ Connections
Premium
 
Premium
 
Premium
 
Premium
 
Premium
 
Premium
 
 
 
Premium Connections
Consultancy
Executive Profiles
Ainsworth Game Technology
Seneca Gaming Corporation
Isle of Man Gambling Supervision Commission
Gaming Inspection and Coordination Bureau (DICJ)
Bragg Gaming
Follow Us

A welcome from your host

A message from the Founder of the Global Gaming Awards and G...

From the Lead Partner

A message from BetConstruct - Lead Partner of the Global Gam...

The year in review

The Event Manager of the Global Gaming Awards reviews the mo...

Casino Operator of the Year 2025

We present to you the 2025 Shortlist for the Casino Operator...

Facing facts: FY revenue figures reflect a turbulent '24

Who soared high and who fell behind in 2024? Gambling Inside...

Taking stock: Moving through to Q2

Gambling Insider tracks online casino operator and supplier...

Preview: This year's Global Gaming Awards Asia-Pacific and Americas

It’s that time of year once again, as the Global Gaming Aw...

Costa Rica: Effective regulation is the industry's path forward

Gambling Insider Senior Staff Writer Beth Turner spoke with...